A Texas judge says civil war may come if Obama is re-elected

I read something interesting last night. Politico, the liberal news & opinion website has by now picked upon it. I want to look at this from first a secular, factual basis and then a prophetic basis. Politico's story starts like this:

"A Texas judge said this week that a “civil war” could possibly erupt in the U.S. if President Barack Obama is reelected. “One of the things is he’s going to try to give the sovereignty of the United States away to the United Nations. What do you think the public is going to do when that happens? We are talking civil unrest, civil disobedience, possibly, possibly civil war, OK?” Lubbock County Judge Tom Head said Tuesday on FOX 34."

Here is the News clip:



Of course, the liberals will make this sound outlandish, far-fetched, and assert that the judge is a crackpot, if they haven't done that already. But the Judge is right. I wrote about what he was alluding to four years ago on my other blog. I'm thrilled people are talking about this openly now.

Here is the context. There are two programs you need to be familiar with which dovetail into the statement the Judge made. One is the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals, and the other is US legislation titled Global Poverty Act. First, the global picture, the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG), from Wiki--

"The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are eight international development goals that all 193 United Nations member states and at least 23 international organizations have agreed to achieve by the year 2015. The goals are:"

--eradicating extreme poverty and hunger,
--achieving universal primary education,
--promoting gender equality and empowering women
--reducing child mortality rates,
--improving maternal health,
--combating HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases,
--ensuring environmental sustainability, and
--developing a global partnership for development.

Sound nice? Well...kind yes and kinda not. "Debate has surrounded adoption of the MDGs, focusing on lack of analysis and justification behind the chosen objectives, the difficulty or lack of measurements for some of the goals, and uneven progress towards reaching the goals, among other criticisms."

The dastardly part comes in how the United States is aiding these Millennium Development Goals. I want you to remember that the UN is not a friend to the US and is openly hostile to Israel. It is a global organization under satan's control.

The US legislation titled the Global Poverty Act is a dear piece of legislation to Obama, and is ideologically ground zero to his plans because the bill he proposed is specifically geared to supporting the UN Millennium Development Goals. He is totally on board with the MDG. What is the crime in that, you ask? Read on, and it is not only a crime but in my opinion, a HIGH CRIME. Here is the American Thinker's summary of the US Global Poverty Act bill:

"On December 7, 2007, Obama introduced the Senate version of the Global Poverty Act of 2007 (S.2433). On February 13, the bill cleared the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, on which Obama and 6 (Biden, Dodd, Feingold, Hagel, Lugar, Menendez) of the bill's 9 co-sponsors serve. The House version of the bill (H.R.1302) passed by a unanimous voice vote last September 25 [2007].

"Here's an abstract of the proposed legislation":

"To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the [U.N.] Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day."

"If enacted, how much of a financial commitment would that represent to taxpayers?"

"One estimate is 0.7% of gross national product, or an additional $845 billion over 13 years in addition to existing foreign aid expenditures. So far, this proposal is barely on the MSM radar, but we're likely hear more about it as a full Senate vote approaches."

"Obama said of his bill, "With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," said Senator Obama. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world. Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing corporate profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere."

The American Thinker editorialized at this point in their article, saying to the above, "In other words, other nations will like us better if we give them our money. And, our trade agreements should not be about business profit, but benevolent social action."

Sound like Obama? I thought so. It is taxation without representation. So why is it a high crime to give 0.7% of GNP to an outside entity who will call the shots with our money? I believe it is a high crime because it cedes US sovereignty to an entity outside the US. It subsumes the US interests to a so-called higher authority without the US people voting to do so. Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a geographic area, such as a territory. For centuries past, the idea that a state could be sovereign was always connected to its ability to guarantee the best interests of its own citizens. [sovereignty definition from Wikipedia]. Giving a portion of the US interests to the UN to control and then worse, be allowed to raise a tax on us without our say-so, is therefore the high crime of treason due to deliberate loss of US sovereignty. This assessment is my opinion.

The bill died in Senate committee and was never passed, but I wanted to bring it up because it is essential that you understand where Obama's heart is and where his heart always has been. It is NOT to reduce poverty. The bill, if it had passed, would have ceded sovereignty to the United Nations. DO NOT let concept that pass unnoticed!

On May 31, 2008, I'd written on The Quiet Life,
"The Global Poverty Act" would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of the GNP of the United States into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for food to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations. The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation. The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but many other collective acts. In other words, the very act of voluntary charity would then be under the control of government ownership."

Whenever I hear words like "collective" and "global" I think 'socialism.' And do you know from when I hear these ideas the most lately? From Barack Obama. Back in 2008, saying Obama is a socialist got you soundly crushed on debate boards and anywhere else you "dared" to say it. But people with two eyes and a love for America spotted the buzz words right away, and just a little digging unearthed the Global Poverty Act. A bit more digging linked the Global Poverty Act to the Millennium Development Goals. It was all there for any person to research.

A few months before Obama was elected I wrote about it again,

On Oct 22, 2008 on The Quiet Life, I wrote about this Global Poverty Act, saying,
"A report from Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media published a critique asserting that while the Obama-sponsored Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption would "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels "of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations." It dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years he said would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends." The UN could raise that tax on the US at will, and spend it at will, with no say from the US, which is taxation without representation. It's also forced charity."

I was outraged that Obama would propose ceding sovereignty to a global, non-governmental organization. I thought that any sensible person would not vote for him. But he was elected, much to my shame. Author, philosopher, and frequent defender of capitalism and of promoter of free speech, Edward Cline, was outraged, too. He wrote,

"I rarely write commentary from anger, preferring a properly objective, pseudo-dispassionate approach to a subject deserving my attention. But news of the details, nature and scope of pending legislation in the U.S. Senate has caused me to make an exception to that rule."

I feel your pain, Mr Cline. Continuing:

RE Obama's 2007 legislation the Global Poverty Act, Cline said, "Americans will be delivered into a state of indentured servitude as laborers for the UN. Perhaps "indentured servitude" is too kind a term, for as horrendous a condition as it is, there is usually a time limit to such servitude. Slavery would be the more accurate term in this instance, for what Congress is considering is servitude by Americans in perpetuity, in exchange for nothing but the privilege of laboring to "save" the world without thanks or reward, of filling the alleged needs of others, of performing unlimited "community service" for the offense of merely existing."

H.R. 1302 passed the House by voice vote, but was killed in committee in the senate.

You might be breathing a sigh of relief, because Obama's 2007 bill has not passed and never will, apparently. Do not breathe a sigh of relief. The bill is merely an external representation of the hatred Obama has for this great nation, for capitalism, for the future of its people, and for life and liberty itself.

Texas Judge Tom Head nailed it. He knows full well what is ahead for America. Anyone saying what the Judge said in 2008 at the height of Obama's Hope N Change stupidity would likely have been run out of town on a rail, but today, today we see how far we have fallen. After all, "You didn't build that."

Judge Head said, if Obama is re-elected, "Now what happens? What happens? Now I’m not talking just talking riots here and there. I’m talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms, get rid of the dictator. OK, what do you think he is going to do when that happens? He is going to call in the U.N. troops, personnel carriers, tanks and weapons,” Head added.

The American Thinker said of Obama's Global Poverty Bill, "He says, "It's not too late to claim the American dream," and they cheer wildly, and some even cry. Don't they know that the American dream isn't a wish granted by a politician, or an entitlement from the government? Do they need a political seer to tell them what to hope for, and dream of, because they are unable to find it for themselves?"

Yes. Yes they do need someone to tell them. And the bible tells us they will find it in the antichrist.

Why are they are unable to find hope for themselves? They can't find it because it only comes with Jesus. Only Jesus is hope. (1 Tim 1:1; Titus 2:13). Yet those without Jesus and thus are without hope keep hoping the next politician will offer that elusive hope to them and then really come through with it. In the end, one politician WILL come through, the antichrist. But in the end he will only bring hope's first cousin, disappointment, and then he will bring death for the unsaved, where there will be no hope forever.

You might be thinking, after this long slog through legislative bills and global programs, old news and Texas Judges, that I am exaggerating. I am not. Look to the bible to see our future. A one world government will exist, led by one man, supported by one false prophet, and will initially offer that elusive hope to the world. The whole world will go after the beast, even the Jews. (Rev 13:13; Rev 18:23). For a global infrastructure to be in force, the world has to have been prepared to accept it. Obama is part of that preparation.

The judge is right. There will be civil war. Jesus said the time of the end will be characterized by war (Matthew 24:6; Revelation 6:4). Nation will rise against nation, but people will rise against people, even internally inside a nation. (Mt 24:7). The world will be in such disarray that when the antichrist proposes whatever solutions he proposes, the people will clamor for them. Global rule will come- it is prophesied.

From what quarter will it come? The vehicle for global rule could emanate from the Vatican. The Vatican is the seat of the pope, who is an absolute monarch on earth, who rules with impunity until he dies or resigns, and governs the world's largest non-governmental agency, having a tight organizational infrastructure in every nation on every continent.

The global rule could come from the United Nations, another large, non-governmental entity with tentacles in each nation on earth. Wiki explains, "The United Nations Charter gives the United Nations Security Council the power and responsibility to take collective action to maintain international peace and security. For this reason, the international community sometimes looks to the U.N. Security Council to authorize peacekeeping operations."

1 Thessalonians 5:3 says, "While people are saying, “There is peace and security,” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape."

Did you catch that? The UN Security Council's charge is to maintain "peace and security."

And don't forget NATO's army. The groundwork for global rule could come from the generals among that large, international army.

The vehicle on which the antichrist rides to global dictatorship could come from a heretofore unknown or unsuspected quarter. But it will come. And Obama will be leading the charge, I guarantee it. Listen to that Texas Judge, listen to those who are saying the time is near. Listen to the Holy Spirit prompting you toward repentance. THEN you will really have hope, because you will have Jesus! His hope is sure. If you don't repent, all you'll be stuck with is Obama, and where is his hope and change now?