New Yorker cover story shows St. Louis Arch divided, Tweet shows divided arch fixed

It's a clever cover. The art work, at least for secular, liberal people, seems to capture the cultural feeling as to the recent race issues in Ferguson, Missouri. Ferguson is a city on the banks of the Mississippi River near St. Louis that recently melted down in fire and riots after a Grand Jury issued a verdict the black folks of Ferguson disapproved of. St. Louis is known for its "Gateway to the West" arch.

Here is the cover art from the New Yorker:

Cover Story: A “Broken Arch” for Ferguson

The introductory sentence to their accompanying article is a quote,
“I wanted to comment on the tragic rift that we’re witnessing,” Bob Staake says about his cover for the December 8th issue, arriving next week. “I lived in St. Louis for seventeen years before moving to Massachusetts, so watching the news right now breaks my heart. At first glance, one might see a representation of the Gateway Arch as split and divided, but my hope is that the events in Ferguson will provide a bridge and an opportunity for the city, and also for the country, to learn and come together.”
I won't comment on the actual events that sparked the article and story art. The news that inspired the story and cover art isn't the point of this essay. You can read a summary here and also a very good essay by Pastor Voddie Baucham here. In it, Baucham speaks to the root of the problem and how to solve it.

Sinful people do what sinful people do. The opening sentence of the news story above is "the world watched live as crowds hurled bottles, looted liquor stores and set this city on fire in the 24 hours after a grand jury announced it would not indict police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown, 18."

Didn't the world watch live as riots occurred after the judicial verdict in the OJ Simpson case? The Rodney King verdict? ("Can't we all just get along?"). The Zimmerman verdict riots? The 1965 racial inequality accusations that sparked the Watts Riot? Many people consider the Watts riot (which was the most bloody, violent US riot until Rodney King in 1992) to be a turning point in Black-White civil rights movement.

What are these systemic issues that keep turning a society upside down? Poverty? Racial inequality? Police brutality? Social oppression? Poor education? The post riot commentary on each of the above-mentioned riots all put forth different reasons for their cause and thus have different approaches to the solution.

However on Twitter, one man solved the St. Louis Gateway Arch divide this morning. Teaching Pastor of Summit Wentzville, Clayton Pruett, tweeted:
I fixed the New Yorker's separated Arch problem #gospel #hope

This is more than a trite acknowledgement of Jesus as the solution to everything. It needs a deeper moment of thought than a nod, smile and a scroll past.

Some time ago I listened to Voddie Baucham preach his text. He had been alternating with another pastor as they went through Romans. Pastor Baucham was up to the closing, Romans 16:3-16. The title of his sermon is "An Extraordinary Affection for an Extraordinary Church" In the summary of the sermon, it is stated,
Most people today skip over sections of scripture like these because they do not see the relevance of a "list of names". In this sermon, however, Pastor Voddie Baucham reveals the true depth of the affection that Paul has for the believers at Rome. It is an extraordinary affection for an extraordinary church!
Here are the names Paul wrote greetings for, and each name was accompanied by a commendation, which I have not included,

Greet Prisca and Aquila,
Andronicus and Junias
Apelles in house of Aristobulus
Greet those of the household of Narcissus
Tryphaena and Tryphosa

This is more than a mere "list of names". First, it reminds us that our Holy God has affection for individuals He inspired Paul to write by name. It gives us a picture of an an extraordinary affection the Apostle Paul had for an extraordinary church.

Pr. Baucham joked that as pastors when they look at the preaching schedule and see that they will be responsible for the passage that has the "list of names" they become overjoyed. He was speaking with a gentle sarcasm and a wry realism. He said more often they say, "Really? I got the list of names? Again?" [audience laughter]

But he said as he began to dig deeper, he found beauty. Allow me to summarize his sermon. Trust me, this will relate back to Ferguson and the broken arch that the cross fixes. In the Romans passage there is a picture of unity that had tremendous implications for Paul and his theology, that would have brought him great joy. It relates to the passage in Galatians 3:26-28,

So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

There is no other entity on planet earth that unites people across ethnic lines like the church. ~Voddie Baucham.
The Apostle mentions male and females, Jews and Greeks, slaves and freemen. Beyond the surface of thinking we are saturated in today's culture, back then, women had little to no value. Even their testimony was counted for half of a man's. Today in Islam, a female's testimony is worthless in court. Yet one-third of the names in the list are women. That was not normal in the first century. And Paul not only included women int he list but commended them as co-laborers! This list is a beautiful picture of the unity of gender we share through Christ.

Andronicus and Junias were Jews, as Paul used to be, as were Prisca and Aquila and several other names. Their names are intermingled with Greek names like Hermes, Narcissus, Aristobulus. Paul had been raised all his life to believe that if you even came into contact with a Greek you became ceremonially unclean. He included Greeks in his list, commends them, and joyously shares equal standing with them.

"It is the work that Christ has done in us that draws us to one another in spite of the fact that we're not the same," Baucham preached.

There is no more Jew or Greek, but only brothers in Christ. From the beginning, Christ broke down dividing walls. It isn't because of a common fear that we have of police or any other government authority. It isn't because of a common enemy we have, (except the enemy the devil), walls fall because of the Savior we have in common, our common Father.

A surface reading of the text will not readily show the names that are male and female, unless you know the masculine versus feminine endings in the Greek. As for the slaves vs. freemen, a deeper reading will need to be done to show who they are. Several names in this passage were well known slave names. Many of these names are gathered at the end of the list. Persis was a common slave name. Rufus was an extremely common slave name.

There is always a strict divide between people who hire people to serve them and people who serve. "Upstairs, Downstairs" is a well-entrenched division. It would have been unusual enough for any organization or gathering of people to accept mingling of servant and employer. However Paul's inclusion of slave names among the list of free names was a startling departure from a cultural norm. As Baucham says, no one thought favorably of the group of people known as slaves. No one can own another person and think favorably toward them as a group because they must be thought of less-than, not equal-to. So here in Romans we have a vision of extraordinary unity.

To further deepen the picture, think of the implications. A systemic and accepted dividing of men into different classes, here, slave and free, had disappeared on Sunday because slave and master sat together in church. Slave and Master attended together, worshiped together, and praised their Lord together. This is highly uncommon in any culture.

Where Christianity flourishes, slavery ends. Caste system ends. Dividing lines over race, status, ethnicity ... ends.

Only Jesus can make a man realize he is no better than his slave. Only Christ can do that. We stand as one before the Lord.

After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, (Revelation 7:9).

For Ferguson Missouri, Christ is the answer, as it always has been and always will be. The transcendent cross, our Savior Jesus died on then rose from, unites us despite our differences, which are only surface after all. We share our sin in common, and we share our need for Jesus in common. Through Him and His blood, we unite, washed in common. The problems in Ferguson are no different than the problems in slave-saturated Rome, in caste-rigid India, in oppressed Iraq. The issues aren't racial or ethnic, they're sin-ful.

Please take another look at the marvelous cross and praise a Savior who is not from earth but came to earth to reconcile sinful men and people so fall races, tribes, colors and status to Himself as a united ONE.


  1. Love it! Praying the Church will stand up and be the real Church... start the healing with the hope of the Gospel....

  2. Voddie Bauchman also had a great article about Ferguson. The black community need more like Pastor Bauchman and less like Al Sharpton, Eric Holder and Jesse Jackson, to name just a "few"

    1. I agree, it was a great article. The link to it is above for anyone interested. After I read Baucham's piece I stopped reading any others. Yes, I also agree the black community needs more Bauchams and fewer Sharptons and Jacksons etc. I particularly liked in his piece why he doesn't feel compelled to respond to every cultural happening. His first responsibility is his flock, he said, and he prays and mulls whether the time diverted from them to write a response piece will edify them or not.

  3. First, Ferguson is NOT on the banks of the Mississippi River (reference 1st paragraph). Second, it wasn't only the 'black folks' (somehow 'black folks' is a put-down kind of term) who objected to the Grand Jury verdict. Lots of white citizens and lots of legal experts didn't like it either, and many white citizens were part of the peaceful demonstrations, etc. Third, I agree 200% that the Gospel is the one most-needful thing in all of St. Louis County. I know for a fact that we have some wonderful black Brothers and Sisters in Ferguson. They're working hard through this. We all wish the Gospel had penetrated more. Next, the Gospel isn't the only thing that is needed. The list is endless. Last, my husband asked our pastor if there was any consideration given for our church to have prayer for Ferguson. We are all in the same county! His request was met with a "no" with a tone that said it was not open for further discussion. Not surprised--probably 10 people in our all-white church (of 150) had made remarks to us because we live minutes from Ferguson, and they smirked and said things like: "Well, now your property values have gone down." "That bunch in Ferguson is something else." "Are you ok?" My husband finally told one lady (I think his patience ran out), after she had made some clearly racist remrks, that he was military police for 4 years with White House clearance, and the officer had over-reacted and had done the wrong thing (WH clearance means that he could walk into the WH fully armed.). Her attitude changed, and then she said, "Well, we'll probably never know what really happened." I could go on and on, but I think my own church needs the Gospel every bit as every other part of this county does, black or white. Sorry for my long commentary, but I get a little impatient when people, even Baucham, speak on a subject they don't really know anything about--i.e., the needs of Ferguson. He hasn't even been here, has he? OK, so we just toss out the need for the Gospel and everything will soon settle down, and the sermon is ended. Me, I'm planning to go into the middle of the riot area next week and make some purchases to help 2 of the stores that were damaged. I plan to BE there and will look for an opening to speak the Gospel.

    Elizabeth, if this sounds a little "much" and a bit contentious, please delete. No problem. Thanks.

    1. I understand that it's a frustrating time, no need to apologize. Thanks for the geographical connection. I didn't look at the map carefully enough, it looked closer to the river than it apparently is.

      I'll let all your points remain, except for one with which I disagree. No, neither I nor Pastor Baucham have visited Ferguson. I am sure it is a city where its residents feel it is unique and special and that people should spend some time there before commenting. However one does not need to visit a place to understand that though a city might feel unique and its problems specialized, the problems are not specialized. They are generalized. They have been the same problems every human being has ever experienced anywhere at any era since history began. This is why it is a sin problem and not only a Ferguson problem unique to the latter part of 2014 in Ferguson MO. Or a Rodney King LA problem. Or a Cairo problem (verdict on Mubarak sparked riots there too).

      As for boots on the ground, I wish you luck in buying items from the devastated stores and doing the other works that will help the city get back on its feet. Thanks for sharing the Gospel there when you go.


Post a Comment