Christian feminism coming home to roost: Retrospective from 6 years ago

Today in evangelical circles we are dealing with an unthinkable situation: serious discussions of the possibility of a female President of the Southern Baptist Convention, and it's Beth Moore of all people. I don't think it will actually happen, but the trail has been blazed. The tweets have been sent. News articles have been written. The discussions have been significant. The possibility has been raised and not rejected. Next time the discussions will go further. That is the nature of sin.

We are reading news articles like this:
The Case for Electing Beth Moore President of the SBC

and seeing tweets like this:

russell moore

And we wonder, how did we get here? Slowly, incrementally, just as all sin happens. Sin has been tolerated, and once the camel has his nose under the tent, soon he enters fully.

Back in 2012 I wrote about how this creeping feminism would affect and harm the greater body. I said that the constant scenes of forward living women preaching and teaching men, being CEO of their own corporations ministries, globe-trotting, leaving children at home, and living lives that in the secular world are be called feminist, will come to roost.

Well, it has.

What you read below is an edited and updated post of what I wrote in 2012. I pray that God has mercy on the young women who see the Christian feminists and become confused as to their roles. I pray that He is forbearing and patient a while longer, so the Bible teachers who live these Christian feminist lives would come to repentance. I pray He has mercy on the husbands who allow it. God did give the metaphorical Jezebel time to repent, and her daughters too, in Revelation 2 letter to the church at Thyatira. But He also threatened to strike her and her followers dead if they did not, and to repay those who tolerated her according to their deeds. Sin of whatever nature is serious, as when it is in the form of tolerating a false prophetess!
_____________________________

There are some celebrity woman Bible teachers today who say that they live a life of biblical womanhood but their lives show something different- and it's equal to the secular feminists. Let's take a look at what the new Christian feminism is.

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" was the feminist motto of the 1970s. The implication was that women didn't 'need' a man at all.

Readers of the blog already know that I am not a fan of feminism. I wrote an essay called "The Eternal Discontent of Feminists", in which I looked at the hypocritical standard secular feminists themselves apply to other women who are perceived as not doing feminism right. That, more than anything, lets us know that feminism is not about equal rights for women, it is about satan's sowing of discontent among women and causing a division away from the Godly roles He has set up.

Feminism has encroached into Christianity. I think most people are still slumbering because I haven't seen a hue and cry against it. Granted, it is subtle, especially in the women who claim to be evangelical in words but actually live a feminist life.
Source
There are now a number of popular Bible teachers/preachers who travel widely, filling arenas, marketing their books, selling their products, and leaving the husband at home to take care of the kids. These women have assumed the lead role in the marriage and are the main breadwinner, and/or the husband is the helpmeet, usually having set aside his career to work in his wife's corporation ministry. While these women call what they are doing "ministry," I call it "feminism".

As with so much in evangelical Christianity, the waters are increasingly muddied on what should be clear. What is biblical womanhood? In today's world is it the Bible preaching, sometimes ordained woman, traveling cross country, her husband at home helping with the kids, often having quit his job to help his famous wife perform her ministry?

Or it is a woman with a terribly flawed view of the Bible who sits in a tent when she has per period as a practice for what it was like to be a woman of the Bible for one year?

Or it is a new feminist who is open to women being ordained, to preaching, and/or to acceptance of gays into leadership positions while touting the rising up of women from subjugated roles?

There is something in between. It's women who claim to be submitted Christian wives who just happen to teach the Bible but really are feminists living a life Gloria Steinem would envy. They are a new crop of what I'll call Christian secret feminists. They live a feminist life inside of Christianity but call it ministry.

One woman who has much to answer for about this new role is Beth Moore. She was the one who broke new ground in how far a woman could go in attaining celebrity status, in workplace and homelife gender reversals, in being the main and sustained breadwinner of the family, and pr/teaching in a church and in the world. Mrs Moore, while speaking conservative values cloaked in all the right Christianese, lives a very forward life. You will see more details on this below.

A spiritual daughter of Mrs Moore in this generation of new Christian secret feminists is Christine Caine. Mrs Caine's language is less cloaked in her declarations of what women can or should see as their roles in Christian home and work life. Mrs Caine is an ordained minister and part of Hillsong Church in Australia.

For example, in an interview reassuring Pastor's wives that despite Caine's visible usurpation of the traditional husband-wife roles, that their stay-at-home role is still viable: "Predominantly I might teach a little bit and I step out into what would be the more classic leadership gift, so a lot of people say 'I'm not that, so therefore I must not have a role to play...'"

It is no wonder that woman are confused when they see leaders or peers taking on the 'classic leadership gift'. And that is one way they cloak their rebellion in Christianese: it is not a role or a job, it is a 'gift'.

Christine continues in the interview by acknowledging that there are "women who are gentle and loving and nurturing", and there are other "women who come along side and do a bit more "non-gentle prodding help people go to the next level." But that in "no way diminishes your role."

Really? Sure it does. It sets up women to be discontent. By justifying herself in the leadership role as a gift from God (and who can argue with that?) and acknowledging that there are 'levels' and women need to get to, but at the same time saying it is important to stay at home and be nurturing...she has completely confused any listener as to the clear guidelines of the notion of what Biblical womanhood is. She says one thing (and not too clearly, either) and does another.

Jennie Allen is founder of of If:Gathering and one of the youngest of the feminist-living ladies on this list. IF is a tax exempt corporation, and shows founder Jennie as President and CEO, working 40/hours week, with husband Zac as board chair working 10 hours week. Allen is quoted in Christianity Today article as saying, "We’ve been slow to step into our giftedness or strengths. For a long time, that wasn’t an option," said Allen."

Discernment tip: one way to detect if a person is in the Word is to see if what they say and what they do match up over time. If what they say and what they do are different, run away.

Mrs Caine's reassurances use a neat scriptural twist. The way satan works with any woman's objection to women taking on home or ministry leadership roles is to acknowledge that the women feel weak or unsure in them, but to get around it by assuring them that all they need to do is have courage to step out and let Jesus work through their weakness, citing 2 Corinthians 12:9. Or simply as Jennie Allen encourages, 'just do it because the time is now'.

In that same interview, Mrs Caine said, "The only way I was able to continue in my role is that my senior pastor's wife stepped into her role and chose not to be threatened or intimidated because the giftings were different."

Oh, I get it. Women are now complementarians to each other. It's the height of irony that again, unwittingly, Mrs Caine acknowledges that these new 'roles' set up discontent and that she is glad that in her situation at least, the pastor's wife wasn't jealous of her fabulous gift of leadership. A good portion of the middle of the interview is Caine's description of how women are to be complementarian of each other in church settings. One takes the wifely nurturing role so that the younger ones coming up can step out, so to speak.

Now, female support between and among ministries is a good thing, and it is biblically commanded. (Titus 2:4) but the description in Titus is for elder women to teach the younger is in their biblically defined helpmeet role, not to be a helpmeet to other women who usurp into classic male roles. It is another twist of using the Bible to justify what is not proper.

Priscilla Shirer is another of these new Christian secret feminists whose life is more forward than their spiritual mothers. I've posted this before but it bears repeating:

"This NY Times article notes that "Priscilla Shirer’s marriage appears to be just the sort of enlightened partnership that would make feminists cheer."

The article describes what makes the liberal and secular newspaper and their readership, cheer. Mr Shirer, who quit his job to serve his wife's organization ministry,  spends much of the day negotiating Priscilla's speaking invitations and her book contracts. In the afternoon it’s often Mr Shirer who collects the boys from school. Back home, Priscilla and Jerry divide chores and child care equally.
"Jerry quit his job to run his wife’s ministry. Priscilla now accepts about 20 out of some 300 speaking invitations each year, and she publishes a stream of Bible studies, workbooks and corresponding DVDs intended for women to read and watch with their girlfriends from church. Jerry does his share of housework and child care so that Priscilla can study and write. He travels with his wife everywhere. Whenever possible, they take their sons along on her speaking trips, but they often deposit the boys with Jerry’s mother,"' states the article.
If you delete the name Priscilla Shirer and substitute Gloria Steinem, and change the word ministry to job you have a description of a life that any feminist would be proud of.

By now Beth Moore is one of the elders in this realm. At age 60, Moore has been "on the ministry circuit" for almost 20 years. Thus, her rebellious example has been long in view for many women who have watched her since they were an impressionable teen. So is Sheryl Brady and Joyce Meyer. Those women were the trailblazers for women in male leadership ministry. Newcomers arriving on the scene such as Priscilla Shirer or Christine Caine, and the younger Rachel Held Evans and Jennie Allen, have learned from the best of the Christian secret feminists. For example:

Beth Moore said to Christianity Today in 2010 that her man demanded a regular home life so she only travels every other Friday and comes right back home the next day.

"We walk the dogs together and eat out together all the time and lie on the floor with pillows and watch TV," Moore says. "My man demanded attention and he got it, and my man demanded a normal home life and he got it."
Aww, isn't that nice. But it's disingenuous in the extreme. The reality is that Mrs Moore is not only gone from home at least 20 times per year on her Living Proof tours, which is a lot if you have kids and a husband. Mrs Moore appears weekly on the Life Today television show, travels for weeks on book tours, where she expounds on the burning question all women in America are apparently asking, "How can women find validation without a man’s affirmation?" and which her book So Long, Insecurity apparently attempts to answer.

She also spends extended private time for weeks in a cabin by herself in Wyoming to write (as stated in the preface to "When Godly People Do Ungodly Things"). She is the President of her own company that in 2011 brought in 4.1 million dollars, with an excess after expenses of 1.3M, stated working hours of 40/week. If you think all she does is lay around on pillows gazing adoringly at her man then all I can say is look at what she does, not what she says.  Beth Moore is a Christian secret feminist because for years she has lived that way, no matter what blather she tells Christianity Today.

It is no wonder women are confused when they see Beth Moore telling us that you can have it all, and still be a Christian woman, if you call it ministry. Enjoli.

Rachel Held Evans "is one of the better known Christian writers in mainline and progressive circles these days. Her book examines what it would mean to live life as a woman according to the Biblical laws for a year. It’s in the vein of books like AJ Jacobs' “The Year of Living Biblically” and other “human guinea pig” projects. The book is funny, thoughtful and empowering for women seeking to understand where they fit within a faith that has largely been controlled by men for centuries" writes Patheos.

Ms Evans says she is an accidental feminist, writing on her blog, "Most of all, if these critics knew me, they would know that it isn’t feminism that inspires me to advocate gender equality in the Church and in the world; it is the gospel of Jesus Christ."

That seems to be another approach to justifying Christian feminism, "it was an accident", or "God surprised me with this ministry" as Priscilla Shirer says, as if stating that since it was all out of their hands they are not nor will be morally and spiritually culpable on the Lord's day of Judgment. I can assure Mrs Evans that Jesus did not deliver the Gospel by His blood so she could use it to promote a different role for women than He has already ordained.

We have looked at some of today's most popular Christian secret and open feminists, the old guard and the new pups coming up. I offered you some examples from their own statements of how their lives in reality more match the secular world's view of a strong feminist woman rather than the biblical helpmeet.

The old saying from the 70s, "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" was the feminist motto. Now the only difference for today's Christian secret feminist is the logo on her purse.
Christian feminists part 2
Christian feminists Part 3

Comments

  1. Hi Elizabeth,

    I saw the headlines, too, about the idea of BM as president of the SBC. I told my husband that, and he exclaimed (rather loudly, which is quite unusual for him), "WHAAAAAT?"

    Anyhow, you are correct. BM teaching is leaven, and the Bible says a little leaven with leaven the whole lump.

    Your warning about the Revelation church of Thyatira is wisdom to be heeded, for sure!

    -Carolyn

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Elizabeth,

    I've literally read and re-read this post, along with the parts 2 & 3 of Christian feminism, several times.

    I will admit I never have given this issue of "feminism in the church" a whole lot of serious thought. I always have understood - thanks to the Lord - that BM's teachings were off the mark. Furthermore, for some reason - again thanks to the Lord - I never have been attracted to or interested in BM, Shirer, or any other of these "women's ministry" teachers. I always just dismissed it all, never attended their studies or read their books, and went my own way (with my husband, of course).

    But now, as I ponder these posts, I find myself getting very concerned. In part, because you cited two references at the top of this post that surprised me. Two *men* - Russell Moore, and the pastor who wrote the CT article (McKissic) - are the ones heralding the call for a woman as SBC president.

    In particular, I read McKissic's "argument" in favor of a female SBC leader, and found it greatly lacking. As it reads, he is looking for every which way to duck and dodge and get around the very clear teaching of 1 Tim, about God forbidding women to teach or have authority over men in the church.

    I don't accept the flawed reasoning that because there isn't a "specific chapter and verse" about a parachurch ministry - or for that matter, a Sunday school teacher, or a worship team leader - that it means we can accept women in these positions. The verses in 1 Tim that prohibit a woman from teaching or having authority over men are to be followed in the church, period. Those verses aren't just about the pulpit. They are about the entirety of the spiritual realm of the church as a whole. That means no women leaders over mixed gender ministries (and that would include denominational, parachurch, etc), no women teaching mixed SS, no women music ministry "leaders" leading mixed congregational worship, etc. It is so clear, and so simple, it puzzles me when I encounter a believer who doesn't believe/accept/understand it.

    What astonishes me is why would *men*, including pastors, be promoting the idea of "women leaders"? That I don't understand. Whatever the reason, it's very wrong thinking.

    Thank you for making this issue of "Christian" feminism more visible, especially for believers like me who just didn't realize the negative impact it was having on the church.

    -Carolyn

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for reading and rereading, Your'e a careful reader and a thoughtful commenter.

      I agree, it's concerning that men are proposing these things. Some of it I suppose is in response to the MeToo movement, and shock at Paine Patterson's firing. Other than that it is a response to sin, tolerated too long in the SBC, sin as in heaven tourism books and preaching; mystical practices like contemplative prayer and circle making; direct revelation; allowing women to usurp men; watered down Gospel; seeker sensitive churches, and all the rest. SBC churches are as guilty as any, and have allowed it for too long. Once you tolerate sin, it clouds the thinking and destroys the foundational integrity. I think we are seeing a collapse now. It won't be finalized in an instant, but it's happening and once critical mass of a Jenga Tower is reached, you know what happens.

      Delete
    2. Hi Elizabeth,

      Thank you, and you likewise are a thoughtful researcher and writer. I may not always agree with you 100%, but I can tell from the all years I've been a TET blog reader, that you say nothing "off the cuff". I look forward to meeting you in person, whether on earth, or certainly in glory.

      I do appreciate this response, as it makes a lot of sense. Yes, the SBC - indeed, honestly, every "camp" of Biblical Christianity - has tolerated wrong teaching and sin for far too long. I know this is sad to say, but as I read your list, I said "oh yeah, I forgot about that!" to myself a couple times. That is sad, that the problems are so numerous, I'm losing track!

      "It [tolerated sin] clouds the thinking and destroys the foundational integrity"... Yes, I understand what you are saying, it's a cumulative effect. And I believe also an anesthetizing effect as well. No wonder the Lord says, when He comes, the virgins are all asleep.

      The verse that has my attention right now, given all of this, is that judgment begins in the house of the Lord... 1 Peter 4:17 Perhaps we are starting to see - or will soon start to see - but I think it's the former - the beginning of the judgment.

      Oh Lord, in Your wrath, remember mercy.

      -Carolyn

      Delete

Post a Comment